Estimation of the Rejection Boundaries of the Spacecraft Schematic Layout by Thermal and Erosive Effects Level of the Electric Rocket Engines Plasma Jets

Abstract

The paper proposes an engineering method to account for thermal and erosive effects of the electric rocket engine plasma jet on the spacecraft structural elements with the electric rocket engines installed on a spacecraft. The method is based on introducing the rejection boundaries that define the region of space, where installation of the spacecraft structural elements is unacceptable from the point of view of certain impact type. The rejection boundary is a surface, where the impact indicators are equal to the allowable value, inside the boundaries they exceed the allowable values (critical impact area), and outside the boundaries they stay below the allowable values (admissible impact area). If the spacecraft elements appear in the critical impact area, position of the electric rocket engines on the spacecraft should be corrected. Equilibrium surface temperature is the thermal effect indicator, which should not exceed the given allowable value; an erosion depth is the erosive effect indicator. Allowable level of erosive action depends on material and characteristics of the sprayed structural element. The considered indicators were determined by the ion current density at the given point in space for the worst case without accounting for the jet ions angle of incidence on the surface. Rejection boundaries were found for the plasma jet thermal and erosive effects of the SPT-100 stationary engine on various materials. It is shown that, incontrast to the traditionally used limitation on the jet divergence angle, the rejection boundary method makes it possible to significantly improve the accuracy of estimates and reduce the probability of errors in the layout of a modern spacecraft

Please cite this article in English as:

Nadiradze А.B., Dudunov А.А. Estimation of the rejection boundaries of the spacecraft schematic layout by thermal and erosive effects level of the electric rocket engines plasma jets. Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Series Mechanical Engineering, 2023, no. 1 (144), pp. 38--51 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18698/0236-3941-2023-1-38-51

References

[1] Kim V.P., Nadiradze A.B., Popov G.A., et al. Problemy primeneniya elektroraketnykh dvigateley na kosmicheskikh apparatakh. V kn.: Model kosmosa. T. 2. Vozdeystvie kosmicheskoy sredy na materialy i oborudovanie kosmicheskikh apparatov [Problems of using electric rocket engines on spacecraft. In: Model of Space. Vol. 2. Effects of space environment on materials and equipment of spacecrafts]. Moscow, Universitet Publ., 2007, pp. 615--659 (in Russ.).

[2] Raykunov G.G., ed. Voprosy zashchity kosmicheskikh apparatov ot elektrofizicheskogo vozdeystviya. Sistemnaya ballistika i effektivnost kosmicheskikh sistem distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli [Issues of spacecraft protection from electrophysical effects. System ballistics and efficiency of space remote sensing systems]. Moscow, NII "ENTSITEKH" Publ., 2012.

[3] Khodnenko V.P. Impact of stationary plasma thrusters on "Electro-M" and "Electro-M1" satellites operability. Voprosy elektromekhaniki. Trudy VNIIEM [Electromechanical Matters. VNIIEM Studies], 2018, vol. 164, no. 3, pp. 44--46 (in Russ.).

[4] Goebel D.M., Katz I. Fundamentals of electric propulsion. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

[5] Kraev M.V., Ermoshkin Yu.M., Chugunov A.E. Optimization of spacecraft engine layout for correction of orbit inclination. Izvestiya vuzov. Aviatsionnaya tekhnika, 2001, no. 3, pp. 64--66 (in Russ.).

[6] Tolstel O.V. Design and optimization of SV units with the use of the genetic algorithms. Russian Aeronautics, 2005, no. 4, pp. 41--45 (in Russ.).

[7] Feoktistov K.P., ed. Kosmicheskie apparaty [Spacecraft]. Moscow, Voenizdat Publ., 1983.

[8] Absalamov S.K., Andreev V.B., Colbert T., et al. Measurement of plasma parameters in the stationary plasma thruster (SPT-100) plume and its effect on spacecraft components. AIAA Meet. Pap., 1992, no. 92-3156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1992-3156

[9] Pagano D., Scaranzin S., Meniconi G., et al. Performance and plume characterization of the SPT-100В thruster. Joint Conf. 30 ISTS, 34 IEPC and 6 NSAT, 2015, art. IEPC-2015-010.

[10] Shuvalov V.A. On the accommodation of the energy of gas ions on the surfaces of polycrystals. PMTF, 1983, no. 6, pp. 17--25 (in Russ.).

[11] Shuvalov V.A. On the effect of the atomic weight of a target on the value of the coefficient of accommodation of the ion energy of a partially ionized gas flux. PMTF, 1979, no. 3, pp. 83--87 (in Russ.).

[12] ASTM E1559-09. Standard test method for contamination outgassing characteristics of spacecraft materials. West Conshohocken, ASTM, 2016.

[13] Akishin A.I., Novikov L.S. Vozdeystvie okruzhayushchey sredy na materialy kosmicheskikh apparatov [Environmental impact on spacecraft materials]. Moscow, Znanie Publ., 1983.

[14] Khartov S.A., Nadiradze A.B., Yakubov A.M., et al. Some remarks about published data concerning the SPT-100 jet parameters distribution. Proc. 2nd Europ. Spacecraft Conf., 1997, vol. IEPC-97-152, pp. 937--941.

[15] Behrisch R., ed. Sputtering by particle bombardment I. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1981.